LITTLE GIRLS. PART II THE WAR OF THE LITTLE GIRLS
concept: Ani Vaseva
photography: Ivan Donchev
theory: Boyan Manchev
with: Elena Dimitrova, Iva Sveshtarova, Ani Vaseva, Margarita Petrova, Milena Stanojevic, Stlla Krusteva, Irina Goleva and Vladyia Mihaylova
The War Of The Little Girls criticizes precisely that spectacularity, which reduces the ‘authentic’ form of life to a lifestyle. The protograpgic images of combating little girls are composed beforehand and pretend to be “spontaneous”, imitating unmediated reflection of accidental situation and play with the gaze of the model, very often “by chance” fixed at the camera. Tension builds up in the images, between the spontaneous, chaotic energy of the little girls and its spectacular, directed media representation.
The little girls in The War Of The Little Girls are power that could transform into aggression inside the group, making the image of the combating little girls a double parody. On one side this is a parody of the “soft” girl images of perfect “pink” consumers, revealing that (their) world could be free and wild, i.e. full of violence, and on the other side – a parody of the erotic “manga” or “gothic” transformation of the little girl in demonic (i.e. sexual) power: the alternative spectacle, exploiting regressive collective libido and colonizing the subjectivation and the imagination of the little girls.
The War Of The Little Girls is based on the ambivalence, on the semi-darkness. The images are always on the edge; it remains unclear if the little girls are in pain or enjoying themselves, if they are really violent or having fun, if they ask for help or are looking at the lens of the photo camera; there is a doubt what exactly is this little girl doing, enfolding the teddy bear with her legs. The War Of The Little Girls isn’t affirming some free emancipated form of life, but shows that every “emancipatory”, or “alternative” ideology inevitably falls into certain mechanisms of representation that lead to media spectacularity. In some sense the media spectacularity is reductive appropriation of those political emancipatory propaganda images. Thus presented the images of the combating little girls show how the “wild” form of life is actually “sculptured” in “cult” images; they attempt to explore the mechanisms through which the form of life self-mythologises itself and in the end falls in the trap of the media spectacularity and myth. The operation of composing an “authentic” image of the form of life produces lifestyle, which on its turn produces new “authenticity” and its corresponding images. Still, for us, most important remains the point where the spectacularity grip locks its trap upon itself, and criticism is reversed into a validation: the point at which the vehement energy of little girls breaks loose, or cannot be at all subjected to the control of the media-economic show; the point where it becomes a joyful affirmation.
Boyan Manchev